London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

2 published Housing Ombudsman decisions about repairs in this landlord’s homes, each read against the source. Part of our Housing Disrepair Index.

Read this first

These are not all the decisions about this landlord. They are the ones in our set, which was chosen because the complaints concerned damp, leaks, heating or pests. The number here says how many we read, not how many exist, and it cannot be compared with the number on another landlord’s page.

Each finding describes how one complaint was handled at one time. It is not a statement about how this landlord operates today, and it is not a verdict on the organisation.

About this landlord

This landlord is a council. It owes the same core repairing duties as any landlord, and because it is also the local authority, your routes differ from a private tenant’s — the council generally cannot serve enforcement notices on its own homes.

It owned 11,983 homes in the 2024–25 Local Authority Housing Statistics return (London, ONS code E09000013).

For how the routes work when your landlord is a council, see council housing disrepair claims.

The decisions

Case 202335961decided 24 March 2026

In case 202335961 (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, decided 24 March 2026), the Housing Ombudsman’s most severe finding on the condition of the home was maladministration, on “Reports of a leak”.

What was decided, issue by issue

maladministration — Reports of a leak (disrepair)
no maladministration — Associated complaint (complaint handling)

Money was involved, but not as a single ordered total — the decision records 1 award, which may include sums the landlord had already offered. The index data sets out each one. It made 2 orders — an order binds the landlord, a recommendation does not.

Apologise to the resident for the failures identified.
Pay the resident £800.

Read the full decision on the Housing Ombudsman’s site

Case 202346048decided 10 March 2026

In case 202346048 (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, decided 10 March 2026), the Housing Ombudsman’s most severe finding on the condition of the home was maladministration, on “Damp and mould”.

What was decided, issue by issue

maladministration — Damp and mould (disrepair)
no maladministration — Damage to the kitchen ceiling (disrepair)
reasonable redress — complaint handling (complaint handling)

Money was involved, but not as a single ordered total — the decision records 4 awards, which may include sums the landlord had already offered. The index data sets out each one. It made 1 order — an order binds the landlord, a recommendation does not.

Begin the damp and mould works identified in the decision.

Read the full decision on the Housing Ombudsman’s site

If this is your landlord

A decision about someone else’s complaint does not decide yours, and it is not evidence in your case. What it does show is that the route works and what it can produce. The free routes come first, and they cost nothing: report the repair in writing, use the landlord’s formal complaints process, and then escalate free to the Housing Ombudsman.

Whether a legal claim is also possible depends on your own facts. Our overview of housing disrepair claims explains what one involves.

Other councils in the index

Listed alphabetically, not ranked. See every landlord in the index.

Corrections

Every statement on this page comes from a published decision linked above. If anything here misdescribes a decision — including if you act for this landlord — tell us and we will correct it and say what changed. How the data was produced and checked is set out in the methodology.

RemedyBridge provides a free initial check for housing disrepair problems in England & Wales. The result is a guide only and never tells you that you definitely have a claim. Checking your situation is free.

Having repair problems with this landlord?

Take the free, anonymous check — no personal details needed to start, and it covers the free routes too.

Check your situation