RemedyBridge

Housing Disrepair Index

Compiled by The RemedyBridge editorial team · Decisions dated 24 February 2023 to 8 May 2026 · Methodology

What this is, and what it is not

This is an exploratory set of 21 published Housing Ombudsman decisions, selected because they concerned damp, leaks, heating or pests, and then checked field by field against the published determination. It is not a representative sample of Ombudsman decisions, and nothing here should be read as a rate, a trend or a league table. Counts describe these 21 decisions only.

What is in the set

21 decisions from 16 landlords, holding 57 separately determined issues, 73 monetary awards, 53 orders and 16 recommendations. Every one links to the decision it came from.

  • Condition of the home33 of 57
  • Complaint handling19 of 57
  • Other subjects5 of 57

Findings on the condition of the home

The Ombudsman decides each issue in a case separately, so these are counted per issue rather than per decision. Findings about complaint handling are counted apart from them, below — a landlord can be cleared on the disrepair and criticised on how it handled the complaint, and the two must not be run together.

  • Maladministration14 of 33
  • No maladministration7 of 33
  • Severe maladministration6 of 33
  • Reasonable redress3 of 33
  • Service failure3 of 33

Findings on complaint handling

  • Maladministration7 of 19
  • No maladministration4 of 19
  • Reasonable redress4 of 19
  • Service failure3 of 19
  • Severe maladministration1 of 19

What the disrepair concerned

An issue can involve more than one defect, so these counts overlap.

  • Damp and mould10 of 33
  • Leaks and water ingress7 of 33
  • Heating and hot water5 of 33
  • Other5 of 33
  • Structural3 of 33
  • Windows and doors2 of 33
  • Pests and vermin1 of 33
  • Plaster and ceilings1 of 33
  • Plumbing and drainage1 of 33

Money

19 of 21 decisions state a monetary award, across 73 separate awards. No total is given, and none should be calculated from this data. The awards mix sums the Ombudsman ordered, sums a landlord had already offered, components of a larger total, reimbursements of the resident’s own costs, and at least one open-ended award of a percentage of rent. Adding them would produce a figure nobody awarded. Each award in the CSV records who awarded it, whether it was ordered or merely offered, and whether it is a total or one part of one.

Where a decision contradicts itself

One decision states a total that does not match the components it is said to be made of. Both figures are recorded exactly as published. Neither has been corrected, because deciding which is the error would mean inventing either an order the Ombudsman did not make or an award the resident was not given.

  • 202417674 — states £1,844.69, components total £1,844.96, a difference of £0.27.

Limitations

  • Selection is not random. Decisions were chosen because they concerned particular defects, so the mix of defects here reflects that choice and nothing more.
  • Small numbers. With 21 decisions no percentage would be meaningful, so none is given anywhere on this page or in the data.
  • Awards are not comparable and are never totalled. Decisions state redress in different ways, and the data records which kind each figure is precisely so that they are not added together.
  • Social landlords only. The Ombudsman investigates its member landlords, so this says nothing about private landlords.
  • A finding is about a moment. It describes how a landlord handled a complaint at the time, not what that landlord is like today.
  • Recency skew. The Ombudsman’s library surfaces recent decisions most readily, so this set leans recent.

The decisions

The finding shown is the most severe recorded on the condition of the home. Where a decision determined nothing about the condition of the home, that is shown as “—” rather than as a clean record.

The 21 decisions in the Housing Disrepair Index
ReferenceDecision dateLandlordIssuesWorst disrepair findingSource
20253722726 March 2026Kingston upon Hull City Council3maladministrationDecision
20234604810 March 2026London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham3maladministrationDecision
20251973720 March 2026London Borough of Lambeth2maladministrationDecision
20211983112 July 2023Haringey London Borough Council4severe maladministrationDecision
20221742428 July 2023Southern Housing Group Limited2maladministrationDecision
20220369124 February 2023Home Group Limited2maladministrationDecision
20240876822 April 2025Sanctuary Housing Association1maladministrationDecision
20242618418 November 2025Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea4severe maladministrationDecision
20252370031 March 2026Peabody Trust3maladministrationDecision
2021258947 September 2023Hexagon Housing Association Limited4severe maladministrationDecision
20221932831 October 2023Sanctuary Housing Association2no maladministrationDecision
20233001310 March 2025Connexus Homes Limited2no maladministrationDecision
20241335528 March 2025Clarion Housing Association Limited8reasonable redressDecision
20241767431 March 2025Peabody Trust3maladministrationDecision
20253077327 February 2026Clarion Housing Association Limited2maladministrationDecision
2024436888 May 2026Southern Housing2service failureDecision
20251713029 April 2026London & Quadrant Housing Trust2maladministrationDecision
20221228228 February 2023Westminster City Council2service failureDecision
20242353329 January 2026Medway Council2reasonable redressDecision
20233596124 March 2026London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham2maladministrationDecision
2023336885 January 2026Peabody Trust2reasonable redressDecision

The data

Three files, because the data has three shapes. Every row carries the excerpt from the decision that evidences it, so any value can be checked against the source.

By landlord

The same decisions grouped by the landlord they concern, for readers who came here because of who their landlord is rather than what went wrong: landlords in the index. That listing is not a ranking, and the number of decisions against a landlord reflects what we read rather than how often it is complained about.

Citing this

You are welcome to quote or link to this page. Please cite it as an exploratory source-verified set rather than a representative study, and link to the individual Ombudsman decision for any specific case. The methodology sets out how the data was produced and checked, and what it cannot tell you. If you find an error we will correct it and say what changed.

RemedyBridge provides a free initial check for housing disrepair problems in England & Wales. The result is a guide only and never tells you that you definitely have a claim. Checking your situation is free.

Check my situation